Thoughts and Questions Around AI Adoption
Stub • 398 Words • Artificial Intelligence, 2026 • 02/13/2026
⚠️ This post contains a rougher cut of my thoughts on the topic and may be updated in the future. Please forgive any mistakes or lack of polish!
I tend to be cautiously optimistic about AI, so I wanted to put together the kinds of things I'm curious about around AI, particularly adoption.
There are 436 words in this article, and it will probably take you less than 3 minutes to read it.
This article was published 2026-02-13 00:00:00 -0500, which makes this post and me old when I published it.
What drives AI adoption now? What about later?
- What phase of the innovation adoption cycle are we in?
What kinds of people like AI? how do they use it?
- The constructive, overreliant, and irresponsible use of artificial intelligence tools in academia: Personality correlates and implications for academic integrity
- Distinct predictors of positive attitudes toward artificial intelligence and general technology: big five traits, gender, and age
- Who Likes Artificial Intelligence? Personality Predictors of Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence
Do people use AI because they want to or have to?
- Not everyone wants to use AI – but do we still have a choice?
- The Rise of Mandatory AI Usage in the Workplace: Implications and Insights
- The Rise of AI in the Workplace: New Stats + Pros & Cons to Consider
- Copper, copper, copper. How Americans feel about AI & dumbing down pop.
- I’m someone who was forced to install it but never used it — but then used it out of curiosity and have now cautiously adopted it
Are some cultures more ready for AI?
Is AI adoption higher in software engineering?
- The State of AI in Software Engineering
- Why is AI so good at coding? There is a lot of simple tasks that are done over and over again
- AI adoption is probably less so in creative fields
AI creates artifacts. If your job is the soulless creation of artifacts then it makes sense for you to use AI!
- Marketing and advertisement does not care about the creative.
- You are at a disadvantage in cost and time if you do not use AI. Especially in more competitive environments.
- AI does not empower people with poor ability/discernment, but can be a multiplier for someone who is reasonably to very competent.
- However if you have AI reading and sending your emails, it really is AI just talking to each other.
- Makes you think that we should instead rethink the system lol
If AI truly is a ubiquitous tool, then making personas doesn’t really make sense as much
- That would be like trying to do persona mapping on people who use smartphones that just doesn’t make sense to me